Monday, July 16, 2012

Frustration is exceeding expectations in regards to the Arizona Diamondbacks


Baseball has been a part of my life as either a player or a spectator for close to 59 years. Prior to my birth in the early 1950s, my father coached a baseball team at Ft. Eustis, VA., that had a centerfielder by the name of Willie Mays. Mays had been drafted after his first year of play with the New York Giants.

Having been born and raised in Cincinnati, the Reds were my major league team of choice as a young boy, teenager and even as a young adult. After moving to Tucson 32 years ago I tried to follow the Reds via cable television and the newspapers (before the Internet and superstations on cable TV).

When the Diamondbacks were born in the late 1990s they sparked my interest especially during the 2001 championship season and subsequent campaigns including the push for a Western Division championship a year ago.

When my wife, Kathy, and I first met about nine years ago she was an argent pro football fan having followed the Denver Broncos. She knows a little about baseball, but lacks background regarding strategy on the best use of position players and pitchers.

During the 1970s, the “Big Red Machine” in Cincinnati used a starting lineup of position players that started just about every day. Since he became manager of the Diamondbacks Kirk Gibson has employed a philosophy that calls on every position player to be ready to start every game. Yes, there are some position players who will start five or six games out of every seven, but there are some who don’t know if they are in the starting lineup until they arrive at the ballpark that day.

There are some position players who will bat in the same position in the lineup day after day. Outfielder Justin Upton has been a fixture in the three-hole for much of his tenure. Yet, reserve outfielder Gerardo Parra has batted first, second, seventh and eighth when he has started. Statistics indicate that Parra’s performance at the plate has been better as leadoff or batting second and not so good when batting seventh or eighth.

Kathy is aware of my background in baseball so she asks questions about Gibson’s strategy of shaking up who starts from one game to another and moving them around in the lineup. One of my favorite managers growing up was Sparky Anderson who liked to use a standard lineup of the same players every game batting in the same spot in the lineup. Ironically, Gibson played for Anderson with the Detroit Tigers and has stated on more than one occasion that his managerial style is patterned after Anderson.

I see merits to each approach, however, athletes especially baseball players are creatures of habit and when habit and routine are disturbed I suspect it affects their performance. I think Anderson’s approach worked 30 years ago. The jury is still out as to whether or not Gibson’s approach will work with today’s professional baseball player.

The other issue Kathy has trouble understanding is pitching. With her background as a fan of pro football she is accustomed to underperforming players being pulled from the game for substitutes. In football, the player that is substituted for can return to a game at a later time. In baseball, when they leave the game they are unavailable for the remainder of that game.

Thus, she has trouble understanding why managers are reluctant to pull starting pitchers early is a game. In this era of specialized relief pitchers she does no understand the concept that an early departure of a starting pitcher can affect the availability of relief pitchers for subsequent games.

Back in the 1970s, Sparky Anderson’s nickname was “Captain Hook.” If a pitcher, especially a starter didn’t have it he was sitting on the bench and someone was summoned from the bullpen. Today, if a starter is off he is given the opportunity to pitch through his troubles in the hope that he will get the game into the sixth inning with an opportunity for the bullpen to take care of the last four innings while the offense does what is necessary to catch up an go ahead for the win.

Sparky’s philosophy worked 30 years ago. Gibson is stuck with pitchers who are specialists in today’s game. Which is best? Have you got a coin so that we can flip?